12 January 2010

The Origins of the Mistrust of Science

This is not a criticism so much as it is a statement of fact: The reason many people mistrust science is that they do not understand it. Either they are not properly educated, are too young and have not completed their education, or have not continued their education to the point of an expertise required to understand certain abstract sciences. As such, they very often cannot understand. And, further complicating the issue: if there is an inability to accept that people first must be properly educated in order to understand many deeper facets of science, they will be inhibited from achieving any hint of understanding. Any understanding without education that they assume they already possess is at best a good guess or estimation; at worst, a misleading error to those who firmly believe it without regard to contrary evidence. Most often, if there is contradictory evidence to a firmly held religious belief, the individual will question the evidence rather than questioning and possibly reframing his beliefs. This is often the case for the individual despite the fact that people have re-framed their spiritual beliefs in light of new evidence and understandings for centuries. But, if he cannot understand the science that contradicts what he already believes, he will mistrust it. Without proper education, he will reject rather than accept knowledge in the face of contradiction to his current understandings. He will reject what he cannot grasp because he assumes to already know, despite the fact that he is ignorant.

For someone such as that, science is consistantly rejected when it contradicts what they believe to be true.

Or is it?

These same people accept and trust many things that contradict what they believe while they remain ignorant, for example:

  • They book flights without understanding Bernoulli’s principle.
  • They pop popcorn, despite the fact that they do not understand microwaves.
  • They book cruises without understanding Archimedes’ principle.

In conclusion, it is science that concerns itself with discovering truth, educating masses, and reaffirming knowledge; not religion. It is science that offers education with the possibility of deeper understanding. Religion offers blind belief and promises to be beyond understanding. Scientific theories are continually questioned and refined in light of new evidence and understanding. Eventually, among many, a theory rises above the doubts, and answers questions wondered from the beginning of time. It becomes a subject studied in greater and greater depth, being further refined and precised. Religions consistently question, compete, and contradict one another. Despite being studied in great detail for ages, they are not refined, and ultimately become more entrenched and entangled in their competing theories rather than more precise. Religion has only trumped science for as long as it has because religion continues to offer punishment to those who disbelieve and rebuke for doubters. The only punishment for disbelief science offers is ignorance or deeper understanding. The only rebuke it offers is towards those accepting theories without evidence or in light of proven contradiction. Ignorance and misunderstanding will always favor religion unless education prevails. Education provides our only proven hope in furthering our search for truth and overcoming the mistrust of science.