You're welcome, Zion.
Just because I think Israel was a bad idea doesn’t mean I’m anti-semetic. I don’t support New Jersey, but I love “Jersey Shore”.
Free idea for Israel: “Israel Shore”.
2 weeks ago
Just because I think Israel was a bad idea doesn’t mean I’m anti-semetic. I don’t support New Jersey, but I love “Jersey Shore”.
Free idea for Israel: “Israel Shore”.
2 weeks ago
GPOYW
If I weren’t neck-deep in reading about the middle east and zombies, I’d probably have something important to say.
Otherwise, I can only say that this is one of the only pictures I’ve seen of myself that I actually felt like saying, “whoa. who is that?” It’s the sort of picture I would clip out of a magazine because I just liked it. (I do that.)
2 weeks agoThis is not a criticism so much as it is a statement of fact: The reason many people mistrust science is that they do not understand it. Either they are not properly educated, are too young and have not completed their education, or have not continued their education to the point of an expertise required to understand certain abstract sciences. As such, they very often cannot understand. And, further complicating the issue: if there is an inability to accept that people first must be properly educated in order to understand many deeper facets of science, they will be inhibited from achieving any hint of understanding. Any understanding without education that they assume they already possess is at best a good guess or estimation; at worst, a misleading error to those who firmly believe it without regard to contrary evidence. Most often, if there is contradictory evidence to a firmly held religious belief, the individual will question the evidence rather than questioning and possibly reframing his beliefs. This is often the case for the individual despite the fact that people have re-framed their spiritual beliefs in light of new evidence and understandings for centuries. But, if he cannot understand the science that contradicts what he already believes, he will mistrust it. Without proper education, he will reject rather than accept knowledge in the face of contradiction to his current understandings. He will reject what he cannot grasp because he assumes to already know, despite the fact that he is ignorant.
For someone such as that, science is consistantly rejected when it contradicts what they believe to be true.
Or is it?
These same people accept and trust many things that contradict what they believe while they remain ignorant, for example:
In conclusion, it is science that concerns itself with discovering truth, educating masses, and reaffirming knowledge; not religion. It is science that offers education with the possibility of deeper understanding. Religion offers blind belief and promises to be beyond understanding. Scientific theories are continually questioned and refined in light of new evidence and understanding. Eventually, among many, a theory rises above the doubts, and answers questions wondered from the beginning of time. It becomes a subject studied in greater and greater depth, being further refined and precised. Religions consistently question, compete, and contradict one another. Despite being studied in great detail for ages, they are not refined, and ultimately become more entrenched and entangled in their competing theories rather than more precise. Religion has only trumped science for as long as it has because religion continues to offer punishment to those who disbelieve and rebuke for doubters. The only punishment for disbelief science offers is ignorance or deeper understanding. The only rebuke it offers is towards those accepting theories without evidence or in light of proven contradiction. Ignorance and misunderstanding will always favor religion unless education prevails. Education provides our only proven hope in furthering our search for truth and overcoming the mistrust of science.
4 weeks agoRussia came into Afghanistan because it liked warm water, but we were all like, “no.” And basically, Afghanistan was all, “we need help, y’all!” and we were all, “I don’t know, we got some guns, maybe some money.” Then Afghanistan was all like “thanks, but not enough.” Then we decided to give them some other stuff, “yo, here’s some ‘copters.” And then the Russians were all, “oh no you di’int!” and then China, Pakistan, and some insurgents were all, “OH YES WE DID.” And Carter was all like, “I’m not President anymore, LULZ!” but first the Mujahideen were all, “omg. y’all we got Operation Cyclone!” and then Reagan was all like, “I kicked ass like this before you were a twinkle in yo’ daddy’s eye.” and the Russians left. And the Russians were left feeling all like, “crap, we ain’t got no money, just guns and shit.” and Afghanistan was all, “LULZ WE CAN HAZ LEADER?” and so then that’s how Afghanistan ended up with the Taliban and all, and Russia was all like, “LOL, Reagan, let’s be BFF’s!”, the end.
Oh, and Tom Hanks did something.
1 month agoRon, entering the kitchen: I don’t think you’re ready for this jelly.
Me, doing dishes: nice.
-5 minutes pass-
Me: Thanks a lot, now that song is stuck in my head.
Ron: I told you you weren’t ready.
2 months ago
KRAKEN!
2 months ago